GUEST POST: Lessons for science communicators from the blue & black (or is it white & gold?) dress

GUEST POST: Lessons for science communicators from the blue & black (or is it white & gold?) dress

A picture of a dress set the Internet ablaze last week. The photo’s ambiguous light source creates a powerful visual illusion: to some viewers, the dress looks black and blue; to others it’s plainly white and gold. Social media users around the world latched on, and the science behind the illusion became a major part of the conversation. You can’t buy this kind of popular attention to a scientific question. But you can learn from it. How can science communicators get better at igniting this type of widespread, passionate, educational, and fun conversation online? What are some of the key lessons we can draw from the phenomenon of the black and blue dress (I swear, it is black and blue).

Read More

GUEST POST: Is it time to undo the taboo against religion in science engagement?

GUEST POST: Is it time to undo the taboo against religion in science engagement?

Even with a recent decline in religious affiliation, around 9 out of every 10 Americans consider themselves either religious or spiritual. This poses a curious puzzle for science engagement. At the Evolving Culture of Science Engagement meeting in Cambridge, we discussed emotion, subjectivity and mystery, but we pretty much steered clear of religion or even spirituality. We bemoaned the lack of racial and socioeconomic diversity both among practitioners and audiences, yet during the event no one even commented on the absence of religion or spirituality in our discourse...

Read More

GUEST POST: Embodying engagement with science

GUEST POST: Embodying engagement with science

Research is already “out there” about several of the ways science engagement is changing today, but it's often hidden in disparate disciplines where the relevant papers aren’t easy for a science communicator or educator to find. I'd like to offer up some work that kept ringing in my ears while I was reading the Evolving Culture report. More theoretical than empirical, this thinking comes out of Science & Technology Studies, specifically from Sarah Davies, a colleague of mine at the University of Copenhagen...

Read More

GUEST POST: New questions for science engagement & communication

GUEST POST: New questions for science engagement & communication

The way we talk about science is changing. In fact, the way we’re doing science is changing. With the traditional model (wherein science is insulated by institutions and practiced only by “experts") transforming into a model that engages communities of non-experts with scientific concepts, stories, questions, and practices, is it time to rethink what we mean by "science"?

Read More

GUEST POST: Telling stories and measuring impact

GUEST POST: Telling stories and measuring impact

When I attended the Evolving Culture of Science Engagement workshop last fall, I was truly inspired by all the talent, technology and pure chutzpa being funneled into creative efforts to engage broader audiences in science. I love the idea of using rap music, comic books, stand-up comedy – anything that’ll grab and hold attention – to get people hooked on science. I also know it works...

Read More

My new Huffington Post piece on scientific authority and cultural boundaries

My new Huffington Post piece on scientific authority and cultural boundaries

Just a quick invitation to check out my HuffPost musings on the Evolving Culture of Science Engagement project and our recent report. As an historian of science, I’m sometimes tempted to point out that there’s little truly new under the sun in science communication. But listening to the creative science communicators we gathered at MIT last year...

Read More

The aesthetic of science communication and how you're changing it

The aesthetic of science communication and how you're changing it

Last night I finished physicist Sean Carroll’s latest book, a page-turning blend of human drama and lucid, personable explanation. Near the end, Carroll offers a different kind of explanation, more subjective but just as well-earned as what preceded it: “Passion for science,” he writes, “derives from an aesthetic sensibility, not a practical one.” ...

Read More